• Home
  • News
  • Misidentifications
  • Viewing Tips
  • Reporting
  • Blog
  • Documents
  • About
  • Links
    • Categories

      • Blog
      • News
    • Archives

      • August 2022
      • March 2022
      • December 2021
      • November 2017
      • August 2017
      • April 2016
      • October 2015
      • August 2015
      • July 2015
      • June 2015
      • April 2015
      • October 2014
      • September 2014
      • August 2014
      • June 2014
      • May 2014
      • March 2014
      • January 2014
      • June 2013
      • April 2013
      • March 2013
      • February 2013
      • December 2012
      • November 2012
      • October 2012
      • September 2012
      • August 2012
      • July 2012
      • June 2012
      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • June 2010
      • April 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
    • Links

    Philippe's page

    HomepageE-mail

    18
    May

    Air traffic controller UAP report in Spain…some past cases

    No commentsBlogMay 18th, 2012Philippe

    Today I came across an interesting headline: Unidentified Flying Object In Denver Nearly Takes Out Private Jet (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/16/denver-ufo-near-miss-jet_n_1521934.html). Hopefully we will know in the next days the nature of the mysterious intruder…
    But it reminded me also about last November’s message from an Air traffic controller report in Spain. Indeed there has been some interesting info in the past November about UAP in Spain. Former air traffic controller spokesman, Cesar Cabo, commented on twitter  about  unexplained objects appeared in the radar screens of three different airline aircrafts. That created some media movement about the fact, and also it brought attention about previous cases (Thanks to my friend Sergio for the lead and the translation, http://cesarcabo.blogspot.com/2011/10/ovnis-haberlos-haylos.html?spref=tw).

     

    Translation: UFOs, existing (or not), they do!

    A few weeks ago, following the uproar caused by one of my tweets, I wrote an article explaining a story in the control centre of Madrid where three planes had asked [the control tower] about unidentified object on their radar screens.

    We will never know what that was, there are many hypotheses and imagination is free and creative, however, that case arouse my curiosity to find out whether or not similar cases abound. The answer is clearly yes, there are many examples hard to explain in a pure rational way. After the initial buzz on Twitter, I got two requests for radio interviews and hundreds of comments on the blog from different countries. Apparently, and to my utter surprise, I had opened a sort of Pandora’s box on UFOs. I never imagined that so many people were interested on this subject, which seemed to have run out of steam after being very fashionable in the 70’s.

    My research among my colleagues surprised me; personally I did not have any experience of sightings and it is something that it is not commented at work. I asked about thirty people collecting more than a dozen peculiar stories.

    Among all, I would highlight the following:

    Seville 1981: A British plane [pilot] communicates with the controller staff. Very scare he indicates that one “light” constantly pursues him. There was no evidence of any other traffic in the area.

    Las Palmas 1983: The controller observes in its radar an object following a commercial airliner. Asking the pilot if it sees something, it responded negatively. Throughout the approach to the airport of Las Palmas the unidentified object escorts the aircraft keeping five miles ahead, reaching the location of the radar antenna the signal fades. On the vertical of the radar antenna is a blind area, and therefore cannot be seen on the screen whether or not any object.

    Barcelona early 80’s: Three commercial aircraft reported a sighting in a short space of time and in different areas. One of them, an airlift of a Spanish company, observes a light that gets in its way. Another, on its way to Palma, notices colour lights that follow in its path. A third, British, sees in the distance a strange light in the air.
    The controller who lived the experience told me that he did not pay much attention to the first report, but when he received the other two, so consecutive, he noticed that something strange was flying through the sky that night.

    Canary 1995: A DC8 cargo, flying from Las Palmas to Madrid, reported lights that followed its path. The controller, as usual, sees nothing in his radar screen. The lights are ahead of the plane, crossing its path from left to right constantly. The pilot stoically “suffers” the sighting until shortly before leaving the airspace of the Canary Islands this is gone.

    Palma de Mallorca 1996/97: Early afternoon, clear day. Several flights to Palma reported to Control seeing a silver sphere landed on the island. It was spotted from different routes to the island.

    The 90s:
    Pamplona, fly military traffic observes a light sphere on the horizon, suddenly, it moves from east to west at a speed of over 5000 kilometres per hour and it is fixed again. This light defies the laws of physics in terms of speed and ballistics.

    Madrid. A military plane going back to the Torrejon air base wants to descend to its approach and requests information on the lights of a plane that is reflected in its cabin, just below the flight level. Air Control informs that the only traffic that may affect it, it is below, but at 15000 feet, about 5km. The pilot, experienced in many military exercises, refused to descend given that the lights are just below and he does not descend until the plane flying en route in a lower level confirms that maintains an altitude of 15000 feet less.

    Toledo. A British plane flying from the UK Canary Control calls the control tower to tell frightened that there is a blinding light that blinds him. The light completely fills the cockpit and takes a few seconds to disappear. Other planes flying over the area also reported seeing a peculiar light.

    Ibiza. The airport is closing. All workers have already left and there is only the on-duty controller to close the control tower. Suddenly, he notices a strange shadow falls upon the beacon tower further darkening the night. Fearfully, timidly peeks out the window and sees the shadow disappears like lightning and the night recovers it usual luminosity.

    I imagine there are hundreds of stories still to discover, for both control and the pilots, commercial and military, and how it only takes the trouble to ask and listen to people tell their experiences.
    In my research with my colleagues, I was surprised with the ease they showed to comment their anecdotes, without trying to speculate what could be what the pilots and they had seen. In Air Traffic Control, we do not have a protocol that requires us to write this kind of situation, so they are absorbed into the anecdotes of everyday life, discussed with colleagues and stored in memory shortly thereafter.
    It is clear that in the Spanish airspace, the more I know because of my job, there are more things that the ones that transcend, phenomena difficult to explain to our minds “supposedly” rational.
    Not because of this we need to fell into alarmism, we can continue flying calm. The Spanish air traffic control system is in the hands of 2000 professionals who, despite everything, professionally serve millions of passengers a year. UFOs maybe not, but you are are always under our control.

    24
    Apr

    The Hessdalen Phenomena: Interview of Ass. professor Erling Strand (Norway)

    Comments Off on The Hessdalen Phenomena: Interview of Ass. professor Erling Strand (Norway)Blog, NewsApril 24th, 2012Philippe

     As this week I will atttend the EGU (European Geosciences Union annual conference)  in Vienna and meet the Hessdalen Norwegian researchers, I thought that it was the perfect time to post this interview of Erling Strand. (all articles’ photos are courtesy of Project Hessdalen, Erling Strand and Bjorn Gitle Hauge)

     

    The Hessdalen Phenomena (HP) are transient luminous phenomena which is observed in the low atmosphere over the Hessdalen valley in Norway. The phenomenon, still unexplained, appears like a glowing light ball with dimensions ranging from decimeters up to 30 meters. Since the mid of 1980’s, camera  observations and data measurements have given qualitative and quantitative observations which complement the observations reported by Hessdalen valley inhabitants. Ass. Professor Erling Strand works at the Østfold University College (Norway) as a teacher in the Department of Information Technology. He has a master degree in electrical engineer from the University of Trondheim and studied physical electronics and telecommunications. He is one of the founders of what is called “Project Hessdalen” (HP) (Website:http://www.hessdalen.org/), a project that has been dedicated to studying this unexplained phenomena. In addition, Erling is also the European representative of the Society for Scientific Exploration. Having had the pleasure to meet him recently (and I will see him this week at the 2012 European Geosciences Union General Assembly in Vienna, I took the opportunity to ask him the latest HP news:

     

    1/ Some scientists remain skeptical about the existence and significance of the HP phenomena. What do you reply to them? There are very few of such scientists left. There have been so much documentation of the phenomena during the years, so I tell them to be more updated.

     

    2/ You participated for the first time last April to an European Geosciences Union General Assembly. Could you tell if this proved to be beneficial and what kind of feedback you received? I haven’t seen any directly beneficial so far, but in general it is important to inform people at the Geosciences Union about the phenomena. Journalists do contact me often. I don’t ask the journalists where they got the info from. Lately it could have been due to my participation on the EGU, – but that is just speculations.

     

    3/ 27 years after the first field investigation in Hessdalen (http://www.hessdalen.org/reports/hpreport84.shtml), what has been learnt on the Hessdalen Phenomena? It is difficult to say this in a short term. We know that there are many different types of the phenomena, and they are capture on radar. – An answer on your question could be part in a book.

     

    4/ Do you have any information on the possible frequency of apparition of the UP phenomena; i.e. what were the declared sightings records of the last five years? And is the Hessdalen Valley the only location in Norway where this kind of phenomena is reported? The data of observations the last 5 year is no good. The only good data source is the amount of observations done during the Science Camp’s, which takes place during one week, each year. There have been observations on all these Science Camp.

     

    5/ Beside the three main types of HP (i.e. white or blue flashed; big yellow lights, several lights together); could you tell us more about the others kinds of sightings that are reported? Could provide a recent testimony for illustrating this? These three different types consists each of many different types of lights. For instance “big yellow light”, can have many different shapes, lifetime, moving behavior etc. There are also some types which does not fit into any of these “big” boxes. There are daylight observations, which are not a light. But there are very few of such sightings. It can be different solutions to all of these types of phenomena.

     

    6/ Last year collaboration was initiated with the GEIPAN and some French research institutes, could you update us on the current status of this partnership and if some results, data have been obtained from the new equipments installed (electric field and infrasound)? The French institutes have installed instruments in Hessdalen, which continuous record data. They measure electrical and magnetic fields. Whenever observations are done in Hessdalen, it is possible to find out if there have been any unusual magnetic or electrical recordings. The data from these instruments need to be collected manually. They are not on the internet.

     

    7/ In order to acquire more data on the HP and come up with a final theory and explanation, what do you think would need to be done? What instruments would be needed and what kind of logistic would be ideal? If founding had been present, we could find a solution. There are no people working full time on this now. I would build logistics on the data, with a main database. There should be better mapping of different physical properties in the Hessdalen valley. There should have been camera recordings in the IR, UV and the visual. A good radar system. Better reporting system. More cameras, so 3D mapping of the phenomena could have been done.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    8/ In 2009 Billionaire Robert Bigelow made a significant donation to the American Ufological association MUFON for supporting a rapid response team that would quickly reach the destination of a high-level UFO event. In the case of the Hessdalen Phenomena, how can you persuade some potential investors to provide some funding or others relevant resources? Why is it important to study the HP? Finding the solution of the HP will give new info about our world. It could be groundbreaking knowledge, because so far the HP does not seems to fit into a known part of our world. Such possible groundbreaking news about our world is important. How important is difficult to say before we know it. Could there be a new energy source? Could this energy source be used so that there will be no need for any fossil fuels? Or maybe even more important info could be achieved.

     

     

     

     

     

    9/ In a recent interview, you have stated that “…you have had several daytime observations, where you have seen flying discs, etc…”Even if not related to the HP, could you please provide more details on such sightings? I have had only three daytime observations, so the word “several” is wrong. I have however seen several unexplainable “things”, – such which goes into another category than HP or ufo. Two of those three observations was a flying disc. The third was a “black hole”. I did not get the impression that I was looking onto a black object, it was more like a hole into something completely black. This “black hole” changed size all the time.

    Thanks Erling for this interview and you success with your Project Hessdalen

    28
    Mar

    Chemical tracers light up the eastern seaboard of the United States’ night sky

    No commentsBlogMarch 28th, 2012Philippe

    NASA has launched last Tuesday from a space center in Virginia five rockets to study the upper-level jet stream (96 to 104 kilometers above surface). The rockets released a chemical tracer (trimethyl aluminium) to form milky-white plumes that allowed scientists to study 3D turbulence in the thermosphere. The name of this NASA experiment was ATREX (Anomalous Transport Rocket Experiment).

    According to the witnesses, the view was amazing…here below is a picture taken…indeed quite awesome !

    (for further info and pics, please visit www.spaceweather.com)

    (Image Credit: Jack Fusco, space weather.com)

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    (Image Credit: NASA/Wallops:)

    19
    Feb

    Dutch TV helicopter films UAP over sea

    No commentsBlogFebruary 19th, 2012Philippe

    An intriguing footage appeared recently in the Netherlands. The wildly popular VPRO program stumbled over a remarkable image. On the 23rd of October 2011, their  helicopter’ s cameras filmed a particular object over the Wadden Sea, between Harlingen and Terschelling, looking southwest and probably between 16.30 and 17.00. In a flash, the UAP passes very fast below the helicopter. Is it a bird, a balloon, a military Unmanned Aerial Vehicle or something else ? It seems that there are no wings and there is a metallic reflection of the sun. The TV show organisers  posted the clip on line, requesting the readers to help them identifying the UAP…
    (Source: http://nederlandvanboven.vpro.nl/ufo-boven-de-waddenzee.html)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu6DuvJ55uQ

     

     

    16
    Jan

    New 2012 Features

    Comments Off on New 2012 FeaturesNewsJanuary 16th, 2012Philippe

     

    For starting 2012, we would like to inform you that two new features have recently been introduced:

    * A new tab has been added on the website. It is called “viewing tips” and aims at giving general advice to the public on the best way to handle  any  unusual aerial perception, while it is taking place. In order to more easily isolate the interesting UAP events from the usual IFO (Identified Flying Objects) ones, it is of of  utmost importance that people learn to vigorously observe, accurately perceive, and precisely relate UAP observations. In that respect, there are a few features that observers should pay attention to: Location, Time, Angular size, Distance, Azimut, Elevation angle…(ref. tab ”Viewing Tips” for explanations).
      *  The Project’s Facebook Group page has been opened last November and the FB logo has just been added on the website” tabs, for a direct link. News and blog entries from  the UAP Observations Reporting Scheme will also be posted there, as well as others interesting news regarding Space exploration, SETI, Astronomy and Astrobiology. See you there !

     

    …Best Wishes to all and Clear Skies !

    12
    Jan

    A mystery UFO halo= A Hole-punch cloud

    No commentsBlogJanuary 12th, 2012Philippe

    Regular observations around the world of giant halos in the sky surface in the medias and are spectacular enough to ignite UFO rumors.

    Today this was the turn of CNN  to speculate over the weird formation of a ”hole-punch cloud” over Taiwan. (Article: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-729071)

    This type of cloud occurs in cirrus or cirrostratus clouds (I recommend you to visit the “cloud appreciation society”, http://cloudappreciationsociety.org for information and pictures), which are often composed of ice crystals and super-cooled water droplets (water that is below freezing temperature, but still in liquid form). When disturbed (e.g. by a plane) the droplets can freeze instantly or evaporate, the latter of which will form the hole.

     

    Interested readers might read a scientific paper that was recently been published in the magazine Science.  “Formation and spread of aircraft-induced holes in clouds” (Vol. 333, 1 July 2011, A. J. Heymsfield from the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, USA) inquired how a hole in the sky can get punched by airplanes and into the potential for the phenomenon to increase additional precipitation near major airports.  Apparently, as far back as the 1940s, scientists have been wondering about the causes of these weird clouds. Heymsfield is quoted as saying that “these holes did not exist before planes and that before WW2 there were no documented sightings or reports of these clouds”.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z91AZnGX338

     

    08
    Jan

    “UFO” takes pictures of Hunter

    No commentsBlogJanuary 8th, 2012Philippe

    One the most captivating UAP book that I recently read is the one from Dr. John B. Alexander (retired U.S. Army Colonel): UFOs. Myths, conspiraties, and realities (Thomas Dunne Books, 2011).  Believers and skeptics will certainly find it interesting…

    Issued in 2011 and beginning with a commentary from Tom Clancy and an introduction by Burt Rutan,  it recalls Alexander’s efforts in the 1980s to create an interagency group to explore the controversial topic of UAP. It also provides keen insight on how the U.S. government function addresses unexplained aerial sightings, providing Ufologists relevant advice for future actions. One of Alexander conclusion is that no U.S. central organization or committee is interested in the topic, or doing anything about it, and that therefore there is no UFO cover-up. On the other hand, he lists specific UAP cases that should call up the scientific community’s attention (e.g. bentwaters, Cash-Landrum, Mansfield, Malstrom Air Force Base).

     

    In order to start well this new year, I would like to follow Alexander’s first attribute (required for anyone who want to become involved in the study of UFOs…): “A sense of humor…”:  So here a light post….

     

    “UFO” takes pictures of Hunter (23 Nov. 2011). Ever wanted to know how a UFO witness would look like? Check this story…A man from Auburn had a close encounter with an Unidentified Flying Object. Like many other UFO stories, he was alone in the wilderness, with no one else to witness the encounter. But in this case, the hunter had a camera. In fact, so did the UFO! (story at: http://auburn.news10.net/photo-gallery/community/88273-photos-ufo-takes-pictures-auburn-hunter?page=4)

     

    04
    Jan

    Christmas UFO: Soyuz rocket re-entry above Europe

    No commentsBlogJanuary 4th, 2012Philippe

    A very good visual illustration of a re-entry of space junk. In that particular case, it occurred in time for Christmas 2011 above the European skies, by the end of the afternoon (16:25 +/- 1 minute GMT). The timing and the sky clarity explain the various good quality videos that surfaced.

     

    This space re-entry was created by the decay of the Soyuz rocket r/b (third) stage, from the very same rocket that brought the Dutch Astronaut Andre Kuipers to the International Space Stationon the 21st of December.(http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMWT8BX9WG_index_0.html)

    Herebelow an illustration of the Soyuz launcher (2004, credits ESA and G. De Chiara – Mars Center.
    (http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Delta_Mission/SEM8XK57ESD_1.html#subhead2)

    Soyuz launcher

    Credits: G. De Chiara – Mars Center

    19
    Dec

    1966 Carl Sagan video on the “Flying saucer’s myth”

    No commentsBlogDecember 19th, 2011Philippe

    A 1966 interview with Carl Sagan (Professor of Astronomy, and Director, Laboratory for Planetary Studies, Cornwell University) and Thornton Page (Professor of Astronomy, Wesleyan university, and Research associate, NASA Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston). Carl Sagan argues that there is no evidence pointing towards the possibility that some Flying saucers are space vehicles from advanced extraterrestrial civilizations, as there are too many UFO visits per day…rather Psychology and Theology roots and not so much the physics of science…

     

    Three years later (December 1969), a symposium on UFOs, sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, was held in Boston. Some 16 scientists (among others Frank D. Drake, J. Allen Hynek, Philip Morrison, Walter Sullivan, C. Sagan and T. Page…) participated to the event and contributed their papers to a book that was edited by Sagan and Page and published in 1972.  This book constitutes an excellent historical reading on the topic, from which I would like to quote a statement that has not aged:

     

    “…The idea of benign or hostile super beings from other planets visiting the earth clearly belongs in such a list of emotion-rich ideas. There are two sorts of possible self-deceptions here: Either accepting the idea of extraterrestrial visitation in the face of very meagre evidence because we want it to be true; or rejecting such an idea out of hand, in the absence of sufficient evidence, because we don’t want it to be true. Each of these extremes is a serious impediment to the study of UFO; they affect different categories of people.”

    06
    Dec

    Sovereignty and the UFO

    No commentsBlogDecember 6th, 2011Philippe

    A recent (2008) serious UAP paper and must read, written by Alexander Wendt (Professor of International Security at the Ohio State University) and Raymond Duvall (Morse-Alumni Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Minnesota) and published in Political Theory (Sage, http://ptx.sagepub.com/).

    It was the first time (if I’m not mistaken..) that an important political science journal had published an article dealing with the UFO topic. Among others points, the author’s argument is that UFO ignorance is political rather than scientific…

     

    Abstract:

    Modern sovereignty is anthropocentric, constituted and organized by reference to human beings alone. Although a metaphysical assumption, anthropocentrism is of immense practical import, enabling modern states to command loyalty and resources from their subjects in pursuit of political projects. It has limits, however, which are brought clearly into view by the authoritative taboo on taking UFOs seriously. UFOs have never been systematically investigated by science or the state, because it is assumed to be known that none are extraterrestrial. Yet in fact this is not known, which makes the UFO taboo puzzling given the ET possibility. Drawing on the work of Giorgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, and Jacques Derrida, the puzzle is explained by the functional imperatives of anthropocentric sovereignty, which cannot decide a UFO exception to anthropocentrism while preserving the ability to make such a decision. The UFO can be “known” only by not asking what it is.

     

    Download PDF document: Sovereignty and the UFO

    
    
    
    

    « Older Entries
    Newer Entries »